Cost Of Homemade Ice Shanty

between language and thought. Thought and Language and Lenguaje domain. Language and domain name.

(Follow Sprog)

First, look to start the analysis data presented in this post now as basis chomskyana philosophy in the sense of considering the capacity to acquire language is innate, configuring it as the cornerstone to guide the organization of our perception and thought. Therefore, without entering into a critique of Skinner's behaviorism, we will base on the axiom of Chomsky second language which models the thought. Hence we

collective legir no doubt that the language is absolutely crucial condition of our world view and our relationship with it. We form our own idea of \u200b\u200bwhat surrounds us from thinking that gave us the language and it is from this intellectual tool that we interact with our environment. Language is the weapon that we use also to relate with other people who shape our social life.

is not difficult therefore infer that, in this context of interpersonal relationships, our language, which we have conceptualized as the origin of our thinking is a standard specifically for social order, becoming a language of their manifestations. Therefore, this language must necessarily condition for its own origin, social thought, and especially political thought. If language influences thought, language as a derivative instrument, determines how we see the world. The example of the way the Inuit have to interact with their physical environment (and social derived from it) means, for example in the richness of their language to describe reality that archive (in terms of snow, ice, etc. ..) Therefore, the Inuit language determines your speakers for a particular conception the world, away from their world that has a speaker Maya. Different languages, different concepts, different logical structures of interaction.

From this concept is easy now to define the language as one of the most effective weapon of social domination. Impose your language to another instead of her becoming the most effective way of conquest. Not only impose your vision, but deprived of the instrument that allows you to have your own or any different from yours. He is forced to think under your mental premises. And with the disappearance of this language are hopelessly lost one of the ways that humans had to describe the universe, and we become, together, forever poorer.

In the first place, as fijemos Data start the analysis presented in this entry that has its basis in philosophy chomskyana in SENSE consider that the capacity for acquiring the Lenguaje are innate, such as configuring the corner stones that guide the organization of our perception and thought. Therefore, without entering into a critique of behaviorism of Skinner, we rely on the axiom of Chomsky as which language shapes thought.

It can gather, no doubt, that language is absolutely crucial condition of our world view and our relationship with it. We formed our own idea of \u200b\u200bwhat surrounds us from thinking that gave us the language and it is from this intellectual tool we interact with our environment. Language is the weapon that will serve us well to engage with other people who shape our social life.

is not difficult to deduce that in the context of interpersonal relationships, our language, which we have conceptualized as the source of our thinking, is standard specifically for a social order, constituting language as one of its manifestations. Therefore, that language must necessarily conditioned by their origin, social thought, and especially political thought. If language influences thought, language, and derivative, determines how we see the world. The example of the Inuit way they interact with their physical environment (social and derivative thereof) results, for example in the richness of their language to describe that reality (in terms of snow, ice, etc.. ...) Therefore, Inuit language affects their speakers for a particular world view, away from having your world a Mayan speaker. Different languages, different concepts, different logical structures of interaction.

From this view it is easy now to define the language as one of the most effective weapons of social domination. Imposing your language to another in lieu of his most effective means of conquest. You can not impose your vision, but stripped of the instrument that allows you to have your own, or any different from yours: you force yourself to think on your premises mental. And with the disappearance of that language are hopelessly lost one of the teníamos that shapes them to describe the universe and human volvemos us, all, most poor forever.