(Castilian translation follows)
Ens trobem sovint amb asseveracions that sense acceptat hem socialment question les and, in my opinion, sometimes hidden perversitats basic concepts.
One is the undisputed right to parental education. Although its original meaning is not only valid, but it is certainly necessary, because modern societies have social instruments of correction should use much more force.
is not imposed since been a unifying vision of reality in the form of totalitarian indoctrination, but to educate the acceptance (if not acceptance) of the values, democratic, society has accepted as pillars of our coexistence, progress and advancement.
Therefore, the physicist who tries to inspire his son the values \u200b\u200bemanating from empirical rationality, or the farmer who taught his daughter the importance of love for nature we must bring down their guard against who (and what could define a field of almost global), denies its ugliness to try to force them to perpetuate their offspring. Who does not know a sexist or a racist, homophobic or that, by dint of jokes, rude or opinions openly, not intended that his son also looks like this?
And here comes in the responsibility parent that the extent of education that responds to both different models and what level of reeixença is as varied as humans are varied, with all degrees of success and failure of the scale, it becomes, almost by definition in a chaotic heterodoxy modelars approaches and applications. To what extent are all responsible when acceptably educate? I am part of a generation in which there was no social models rather than the parents, with all its ideological burdens individuals. We, who no longer return to forty we were taught, for example and among many other things, the importance of practice intercourse varied by gender and, moreover, although the absolute values \u200b\u200bof buidéssim, sex was a certain tendency to be negative, albeit only for social marginalization which dumped. And to counter these and other obscurantism, we had to look for life (and on the responses contained elements of progress were absolutely ideologised, at a time it seemed that political dogma was only valid during the transition )
Who should bring order to these excesses educational? We, without doubt. The democratically organized society, which should ensure that the child does not become a social outcast, product of their attachment to racism or homophobia, for example, or a pathetic energumen that denies equality to his father instilled in him a retrograde vision of women. Ensuring it will ensure parallel progress by humanity as a whole, our original objective social organization.
Let's be clear and say it loud. Our youth should not be any more anti-social pathologies vehicle, religious or overtly criminal parents of a manifestly incompetent in the most literal sense of the term. Must be corrected so that the public education to children in explaining what kind of person we hope that all become. And above all, we put off parents who, claiming to be in possession of truth, wish to deny their children normal democratic ideology and mostly accepted. Just want to perpetuate their own flaws to make them more bearable.
We are in Menudo with aseveraciones that heme socialmente Accepted cuestionarlas sin and that, in my opinion, sometimes esconden perversidades conceptual basicair.
One of them is the undisputed right to parental education. If well at its original senses are not only valid, but that was undoubtedly Necessary, ya las Sociedades feature of modern social deberian instrumentos corrections used more force.
is not from the state to impose a unifying vision of reality, as a totalitarian indoctrination, but to educate on the acceptance (if not ownership) of the values \u200b\u200bthat democratically society has accepted as the foundation of our coexistence , progress and advancement.
Therefore, the physicist who tries to inspire your child the values \u200b\u200bemanating from empirical rationality, or the peasant who teaches his daughter the importance of love for nature should not lead us to lower our guard against those who (and a area that could be defined as global quasi), denies his baseness to force their offspring to perpetuate. Who does not know a sexist or a racist or a homophobe who, by dint of jokes, rude or opinions openly, do not try that your child will also appear in that?
And here comes in parental responsibility, which, to the extent that education responds to such diverse models whose level of achievement is as varied as humans are varied, with all degrees of success and failure scale becomes, almost by definition, in a chaotic and unorthodox approaches modelares applications. To what extent are we all accept responsibility when it comes to education? I am part of a generation that did not exist beyond social models the parents, with all its particular ideological burdens. We, again no longer turn forty, we were taught, for example and among many other things, that the importance of practicing sexual intercourse varied by gender and also stripped away even though the absolute values, a certain sexual orientation was negative per se, if only because of social marginality that led inevitably. And to counteract that and other obscurantism, we had to look for life (and above, the response containing elements of progress were entirely ideological, in a historical moment of transition, in which only policy dogma seemed to be valid.)
Who should put a stop to these excesses educational? We, no doubt. The democratically organized society, must ensure that the child does not become a social outcast, as a result of their affiliation to racism or homophobia, for example, or a pathetic madman denying gender equality why his father instilled in her a retrograde vision of women. He will watch to ensure progress in parallel by all humanity, primordial objective of our social organization. Let us
we say loud and clear. Our youth should never be more a vehicle for anti-social pathologies, overtly religious or criminal of parents manifestly incompetent in the most literal sense of the term. It is necessary for the correct public education, explaining to children what kind of people we hope to become. And above all, distrust of parents who, claiming to be in possession of truth, want to deny their children normal democratic ideological and largely accepted. They just want to perpetuate their own flaws to them more bearable.
0 comments:
Post a Comment