(Follow the translation English)
The socialization of knowledge leads to questioning religious as the magic answer, as we have known for two hundred thousand years that paleontologists our encrypted fingerprint. During this period, humanity as a whole, has not had access to knowledge, what liturgy was reserved for initiates, guides to the knowledge of interested and where the observation of natural events and the supernatural explanation were inextricably intertwined either dominated by interest, either epistemological comfort (because the players that are elevated in reality had no response or the ability to obtain it, or the inquisitive spirit essential to do so, arranged in a posició de poder). Es recurrent en la història, en aquestes circumstàncies, perseguir el dubte i simplificar les explicacions, sempre sobre la base de la creença, ja que d’aquest sistema acrític el dubte conceptual en queda fora per definició.
Això no només ha estat vàlid per l’especulació purament teològica, sinó també, a causa d’aquesta indestriable amalgama doctrinària, per l’empirisme acadèmic imperant fins finals del segle XIX (sinó més enllà), on teories tan universalitzades com la de l’evolució darwniana, eren anatemitzades com l’església cristiana anatemitzava l’heliocentrisme copernicà.
Today, at least in the so-called first world, and so unpredictably accelerated in emerging countries (economically) as China and India, representing one third of humanity, access to knowledge, to varying degrees, is the available to everyone, which, inevitably, is to stimulate critical thinking globally. Despite the danger of manipulation of information that could endanger the analytical thinking routed it to the uniformity accommodative, that ultimately can not be a perversion inevitable, but in the long run to beat, to the extent that access to facts and opinions are increasingly universalized. And we can give examples: In the U.S., where information about the Iraq war is censored and false slogans and common interest have been discovered, the population gradually ceases to believe in identifying manipulative sources (such as government .) Or in Spain, where the attempt by the right to redefine the size of reality from certain media, at last, has failed miserably in the midst of ridicule. Interestingly, both attempts have been perpetrated by forces either inextricably linked to organized religion or by itself with its own means. We congratulate ourselves and describing his failure as a example of our point of view because, despite everything, the question of knowledge and the need to dispel it goes totally opposite to the direction of our ancestors and the shelter is now completely empty of esoteric restless minds and independent thinking This
critical of the paranormal explanation of reality through religion, but has existed in recent centuries, it is also true that it was minor and insufficient to break with millennia of faith in magic as an explanation. But this clash is occurring before our eyes. This must be, above the chaos of technical or economic and climate, the feature that should differentiate the space of human history in which we live. We owe those who kill and liberate man from his ancestral slavery, to get you where you can glimpse levels of humanization still only interviews, and in any case incompatible with that bending over to idols, in the end, we have invented ourselves because we end up dominating. No god has made us, but we all have done them all. It came time to dispense with them because they represented the mental concept is no longer useful.
needed the next step. We are in advanced.
The socialization of knowledge leads to questioning religious as the magic answer, as we have known for two hundred thousand years that paleontologists our encrypted fingerprint. During this period, humanity as a whole, has not had access to knowledge, what liturgy was reserved for initiates, guides to the knowledge of interested and where the observation of natural events and the supernatural explanation were inextricably intertwined either dominated by interest, either epistemological comfort (because the players that are elevated in reality had no response or the ability to obtain it, or the inquisitive spirit essential to do so, arranged in a posició de poder). Es recurrent en la història, en aquestes circumstàncies, perseguir el dubte i simplificar les explicacions, sempre sobre la base de la creença, ja que d’aquest sistema acrític el dubte conceptual en queda fora per definició.
Això no només ha estat vàlid per l’especulació purament teològica, sinó també, a causa d’aquesta indestriable amalgama doctrinària, per l’empirisme acadèmic imperant fins finals del segle XIX (sinó més enllà), on teories tan universalitzades com la de l’evolució darwniana, eren anatemitzades com l’església cristiana anatemitzava l’heliocentrisme copernicà.
Today, at least in the so-called first world, and so unpredictably accelerated in emerging countries (economically) as China and India, representing one third of humanity, access to knowledge, to varying degrees, is the available to everyone, which, inevitably, is to stimulate critical thinking globally. Despite the danger of manipulation of information that could endanger the analytical thinking routed it to the uniformity accommodative, that ultimately can not be a perversion inevitable, but in the long run to beat, to the extent that access to facts and opinions are increasingly universalized. And we can give examples: In the U.S., where information about the Iraq war is censored and false slogans and common interest have been discovered, the population gradually ceases to believe in identifying manipulative sources (such as government .) Or in Spain, where the attempt by the right to redefine the size of reality from certain media, at last, has failed miserably in the midst of ridicule. Interestingly, both attempts have been perpetrated by forces either inextricably linked to organized religion or by itself with its own means. We congratulate ourselves and describing his failure as a example of our point of view because, despite everything, the question of knowledge and the need to dispel it goes totally opposite to the direction of our ancestors and the shelter is now completely empty of esoteric restless minds and independent thinking This
critical of the paranormal explanation of reality through religion, but has existed in recent centuries, it is also true that it was minor and insufficient to break with millennia of faith in magic as an explanation. But this clash is occurring before our eyes. This must be, above the chaos of technical or economic and climate, the feature that should differentiate the space of human history in which we live. We owe those who kill and liberate man from his ancestral slavery, to get you where you can glimpse levels of humanization still only interviews, and in any case incompatible with that bending over to idols, in the end, we have invented ourselves because we end up dominating. No god has made us, but we all have done them all. It came time to dispense with them because they represented the mental concept is no longer useful.
needed the next step. We are in advanced.
The socialization of knowledge leads to the questioning of religious magic in response as we have known for two hundred thousand years that paleontologists put our mark. During this period, humanity as a whole has not had access to knowledge, whose liturgy was reserved for the initiated, to guide interested knowledge, and where observation of natural events and supernatural explanation were inextricably interwoven, either dominated interest, either for convenience epistemological (because those performers were erected in reality had no response, or ability to obtain, or the spirit of inquiry essential to do so, arranged in a position of power). Recurs in history, in such circumstances, to pursue questions and simplify the explanations provided on the basis of belief, because the conceptual question is always out, by definition, this system uncritically.
That has been true not only for purely theological speculation, but also because of the amalgamation indiscernible doctrinaire, academic empiricism prevailed until the late nineteenth century (if not beyond), where as universalized theories such as Darwinian evolution were anathematized anathematized Christian churches as the Copernican heliocentric.
Today, at least the so-called first world, so unexpectedly accelerated in countries like China and India, representing a third of the world, access to knowledge in varying degrees, is available to all who, of necessity, should stimulate a critical global . Despite the danger that the manipulation of information could jeopardize the analytical thinking, directing it towards uniformity accommodative, it ultimately should not cease to be a perversion inevitable, but ultimately surmountable, to the extent that access to facts and opinions cava is more universal. And we can give examples: In the U.S., where information about the war Iraq is censored and false slogans and common interest have been discovered, the population gradually stop believing in the sources identified as manipulative (as the government). Or the English state, where the attempt by the right to redefine reality to suit certain forms has failed miserably from the ridiculous. Interestingly, both attempts have been carried out by forces linked indiscernibly well organized religion, either by itself from its own resources. We should welcome its failure and describe it as an example of our point of view why, despite all the doubt and the need for knowledge to fade moves towards completely opposite to that of our ancestors and the esoteric shelter is now completely empty of restless consciences.
That independent thinking and critical of the paranormal explanation of reality through religion, while there has been over the past centuries, is no less true that there has been minor and insufficient to break with millennia of faith in magic as an explanation . But now the clash is occurring before our eyes. That should be above the "technical or environmental chaos, the differential fact of history space in which we live. We are who we kill the gods i liberate man from his ancestral slavery, to take where levels of humanization can see today only interviews and in any case incompatible with prostrations before idols, in the end, only we have invented and have come to dominate. No god has given us, but we do them all. It is time to dispense with them because the mental concept is no longer representing be useful.
have to take the next step. We are the battering ram.
0 comments:
Post a Comment