(Castilian translation follows)
we encountered during this period (the years our dark smoke) with people with different intent, they blame our vice. ¿Remember what was your attitude towards them?
In particular, I was belligerent. Being (as undoubtedly been those who have smoked) aware of the malignancy of my addiction, both for its physical destruction as well as their mental esclavatges, was convinced that was the only owner of my decision to my health.
Today, in transition from my firm position that smoking leads to ten months without smoking for former smokers, with the conviction that my crushed stone path has no return, that mental illness and poverty are no longer an option, I still maintain that we should not show hostility against those who smoke. And, much less play the game the establishment of rules and prohibitions, under the pretext of wanting to cure addicts, coercitivament impose protective mantle of the State on our personal behavior.
was really a concern and a personal challenge not to fall into what I call "the syndrome of San Pablo fallen horse," and since my "conversion" began to persecute smokers (remember that Stalin was seminarian There are both examples ...) It
that our far-sighted understanding that we will not take up smoking to think they must do and we have no strength, and perhaps the moral obligation, to make him see it, aside from the respect freedom of each individual to decide what to do with your life and health. I do not want to smoke, but I still have the freedom to do this my will and not for others, whether friends, relatives or police.
All that we smoked heme heme encontrado ese during period (our Dark Years (u oscurecidos by the smoke)) con gente that, with different intentions, blasmado have our vices. ¿Vuestra attitude recall which was in front of them?
In particular, mine was belligerent. Being, as indeed we are all we have smoked, aware of the malignancy of my service, both for its physical damage and for its mental esclavajes was convinced it was the sole owner of my decision and my health.
Today, in my strong transition and from my position as a smoker who has ten months without smoking at an ex-smoker, crushed rock with conviction that my path has no return, that disease and mental misery are no longer an option, I still maintain that we should not show hostility against those who smoke. Much less, further the game to the establishment of rules and prohibitions under the pretext of wanting to cure addicts, coercively imposed the protective mantle of the State on our personal behavior.
was really a concern and a personal challenge not to fall into what I call the "syndrome of San Pablo fallen from his horse" and since my "conversion", begin to chase the smokers (remember that Stalin was a seminarian and there are so many examples ...)
It's just that our farsighted understanding that we should not smoke does not lead us to believe that anyone should do it and we have the strength and perhaps a moral obligation make him see, regardless of respect for individual freedom of each to decide what to do with your life and your health. I do not want to smoke, but I still have the freedom to do my own will and not by others, whether friends, family or police.
0 comments:
Post a Comment