What To Do For A Viral Eye Infection?

magic. / The magic of the slope.

(Follow the translation English)

The socialization of knowledge leads to questioning religious as the magic answer, as we have known for two hundred thousand years that paleontologists our encrypted fingerprint. During this period, humanity as a whole, has not had access to knowledge, what liturgy was reserved for initiates, guides to the knowledge of interested and where the observation of natural events and the supernatural explanation were inextricably intertwined either dominated by interest, either epistemological comfort (because the players that are elevated in reality had no response or the ability to obtain it, or the inquisitive spirit essential to do so, arranged in a posició de poder). Es recurrent en la història, en aquestes circumstàncies, perseguir el dubte i simplificar les explicacions, sempre sobre la base de la creença, ja que d’aquest sistema acrític el dubte conceptual en queda fora per definició.

Això no només ha estat vàlid per l’especulació purament teològica, sinó també, a causa d’aquesta indestriable amalgama doctrinària, per l’empirisme acadèmic imperant fins finals del segle XIX (sinó més enllà), on teories tan universalitzades com la de l’evolució darwniana, eren anatemitzades com l’església cristiana anatemitzava l’heliocentrisme copernicà.

Today, at least in the so-called first world, and so unpredictably accelerated in emerging countries (economically) as China and India, representing one third of humanity, access to knowledge, to varying degrees, is the available to everyone, which, inevitably, is to stimulate critical thinking globally. Despite the danger of manipulation of information that could endanger the analytical thinking routed it to the uniformity accommodative, that ultimately can not be a perversion inevitable, but in the long run to beat, to the extent that access to facts and opinions are increasingly universalized. And we can give examples: In the U.S., where information about the Iraq war is censored and false slogans and common interest have been discovered, the population gradually ceases to believe in identifying manipulative sources (such as government .) Or in Spain, where the attempt by the right to redefine the size of reality from certain media, at last, has failed miserably in the midst of ridicule. Interestingly, both attempts have been perpetrated by forces either inextricably linked to organized religion or by itself with its own means. We congratulate ourselves and describing his failure as a example of our point of view because, despite everything, the question of knowledge and the need to dispel it goes totally opposite to the direction of our ancestors and the shelter is now completely empty of esoteric restless minds and independent thinking This

critical of the paranormal explanation of reality through religion, but has existed in recent centuries, it is also true that it was minor and insufficient to break with millennia of faith in magic as an explanation. But this clash is occurring before our eyes. This must be, above the chaos of technical or economic and climate, the feature that should differentiate the space of human history in which we live. We owe those who kill and liberate man from his ancestral slavery, to get you where you can glimpse levels of humanization still only interviews, and in any case incompatible with that bending over to idols, in the end, we have invented ourselves because we end up dominating. No god has made us, but we all have done them all. It came time to dispense with them because they represented the mental concept is no longer useful.

needed the next step. We are in advanced.

The socialization of knowledge leads to the questioning of religious magic in response as we have known for two hundred thousand years that paleontologists put our mark. During this period, humanity as a whole has not had access to knowledge, whose liturgy was reserved for the initiated, to guide interested knowledge, and where observation of natural events and supernatural explanation were inextricably interwoven, either dominated interest, either for convenience epistemological (because those performers were erected in reality had no response, or ability to obtain, or the spirit of inquiry essential to do so, arranged in a position of power). Recurs in history, in such circumstances, to pursue questions and simplify the explanations provided on the basis of belief, because the conceptual question is always out, by definition, this system uncritically.

That has been true not only for purely theological speculation, but also because of the amalgamation indiscernible doctrinaire, academic empiricism prevailed until the late nineteenth century (if not beyond), where as universalized theories such as Darwinian evolution were anathematized anathematized Christian churches as the Copernican heliocentric.

Today, at least the so-called first world, so unexpectedly accelerated in countries like China and India, representing a third of the world, access to knowledge in varying degrees, is available to all who, of necessity, should stimulate a critical global . Despite the danger that the manipulation of information could jeopardize the analytical thinking, directing it towards uniformity accommodative, it ultimately should not cease to be a perversion inevitable, but ultimately surmountable, to the extent that access to facts and opinions cava is more universal. And we can give examples: In the U.S., where information about the war Iraq is censored and false slogans and common interest have been discovered, the population gradually stop believing in the sources identified as manipulative (as the government). Or the English state, where the attempt by the right to redefine reality to suit certain forms has failed miserably from the ridiculous. Interestingly, both attempts have been carried out by forces linked indiscernibly well organized religion, either by itself from its own resources. We should welcome its failure and describe it as an example of our point of view why, despite all the doubt and the need for knowledge to fade moves towards completely opposite to that of our ancestors and the esoteric shelter is now completely empty of restless consciences.

That independent thinking and critical of the paranormal explanation of reality through religion, while there has been over the past centuries, is no less true that there has been minor and insufficient to break with millennia of faith in magic as an explanation . But now the clash is occurring before our eyes. That should be above the "technical or environmental chaos, the differential fact of history space in which we live. We are who we kill the gods i liberate man from his ancestral slavery, to take where levels of humanization can see today only interviews and in any case incompatible with prostrations before idols, in the end, only we have invented and have come to dominate. No god has given us, but we do them all. It is time to dispense with them because the mental concept is no longer representing be useful.

have to take the next step. We are the battering ram.

Hide My Pc Network Ubuntu

Education and irresponsibility. / E irresponsabilidad Education. The St. Paul

(Castilian translation follows)


Ens trobem sovint amb asseveracions that sense acceptat hem socialment question les and, in my opinion, sometimes hidden perversitats basic concepts.

One is the undisputed right to parental education. Although its original meaning is not only valid, but it is certainly necessary, because modern societies have social instruments of correction should use much more force.

is not imposed since been a unifying vision of reality in the form of totalitarian indoctrination, but to educate the acceptance (if not acceptance) of the values, democratic, society has accepted as pillars of our coexistence, progress and advancement.

Therefore, the physicist who tries to inspire his son the values \u200b\u200bemanating from empirical rationality, or the farmer who taught his daughter the importance of love for nature we must bring down their guard against who (and what could define a field of almost global), denies its ugliness to try to force them to perpetuate their offspring. Who does not know a sexist or a racist, homophobic or that, by dint of jokes, rude or opinions openly, not intended that his son also looks like this?

And here comes in the responsibility parent that the extent of education that responds to both different models and what level of reeixença is as varied as humans are varied, with all degrees of success and failure of the scale, it becomes, almost by definition in a chaotic heterodoxy modelars approaches and applications. To what extent are all responsible when acceptably educate? I am part of a generation in which there was no social models rather than the parents, with all its ideological burdens individuals. We, who no longer return to forty we were taught, for example and among many other things, the importance of practice intercourse varied by gender and, moreover, although the absolute values \u200b\u200bof buidéssim, sex was a certain tendency to be negative, albeit only for social marginalization which dumped. And to counter these and other obscurantism, we had to look for life (and on the responses contained elements of progress were absolutely ideologised, at a time it seemed that political dogma was only valid during the transition )

Who should bring order to these excesses educational? We, without doubt. The democratically organized society, which should ensure that the child does not become a social outcast, product of their attachment to racism or homophobia, for example, or a pathetic energumen that denies equality to his father instilled in him a retrograde vision of women. Ensuring it will ensure parallel progress by humanity as a whole, our original objective social organization.

Let's be clear and say it loud. Our youth should not be any more anti-social pathologies vehicle, religious or overtly criminal parents of a manifestly incompetent in the most literal sense of the term. Must be corrected so that the public education to children in explaining what kind of person we hope that all become. And above all, we put off parents who, claiming to be in possession of truth, wish to deny their children normal democratic ideology and mostly accepted. Just want to perpetuate their own flaws to make them more bearable.

We are in Menudo with aseveraciones that heme socialmente Accepted cuestionarlas sin and that, in my opinion, sometimes esconden perversidades conceptual basicair.

One of them is the undisputed right to parental education. If well at its original senses are not only valid, but that was undoubtedly Necessary, ya las Sociedades feature of modern social deberian instrumentos corrections used more force.

is not from the state to impose a unifying vision of reality, as a totalitarian indoctrination, but to educate on the acceptance (if not ownership) of the values \u200b\u200bthat democratically society has accepted as the foundation of our coexistence , progress and advancement.

Therefore, the physicist who tries to inspire your child the values \u200b\u200bemanating from empirical rationality, or the peasant who teaches his daughter the importance of love for nature should not lead us to lower our guard against those who (and a area that could be defined as global quasi), denies his baseness to force their offspring to perpetuate. Who does not know a sexist or a racist or a homophobe who, by dint of jokes, rude or opinions openly, do not try that your child will also appear in that?

And here comes in parental responsibility, which, to the extent that education responds to such diverse models whose level of achievement is as varied as humans are varied, with all degrees of success and failure scale becomes, almost by definition, in a chaotic and unorthodox approaches modelares applications. To what extent are we all accept responsibility when it comes to education? I am part of a generation that did not exist beyond social models the parents, with all its particular ideological burdens. We, again no longer turn forty, we were taught, for example and among many other things, that the importance of practicing sexual intercourse varied by gender and also stripped away even though the absolute values, a certain sexual orientation was negative per se, if only because of social marginality that led inevitably. And to counteract that and other obscurantism, we had to look for life (and above, the response containing elements of progress were entirely ideological, in a historical moment of transition, in which only policy dogma seemed to be valid.)

Who should put a stop to these excesses educational? We, no doubt. The democratically organized society, must ensure that the child does not become a social outcast, as a result of their affiliation to racism or homophobia, for example, or a pathetic madman denying gender equality why his father instilled in her a retrograde vision of women. He will watch to ensure progress in parallel by all humanity, primordial objective of our social organization. Let us

we say loud and clear. Our youth should never be more a vehicle for anti-social pathologies, overtly religious or criminal of parents manifestly incompetent in the most literal sense of the term. It is necessary for the correct public education, explaining to children what kind of people we hope to become. And above all, distrust of parents who, claiming to be in possession of truth, want to deny their children normal democratic ideological and largely accepted. They just want to perpetuate their own flaws to them more bearable.

Stats On Lactose Intolerance 2011

syndrome fallen horse. / / The syndrome of St. Paul's horse fall

(Castilian translation follows)

All who have smoked

we encountered during this period (the years our dark smoke) with people with different intent, they blame our vice. ¿Remember what was your attitude towards them?

In particular, I was belligerent. Being (as undoubtedly been those who have smoked) aware of the malignancy of my addiction, both for its physical destruction as well as their mental esclavatges, was convinced that was the only owner of my decision to my health.

Today, in transition from my firm position that smoking leads to ten months without smoking for former smokers, with the conviction that my crushed stone path has no return, that mental illness and poverty are no longer an option, I still maintain that we should not show hostility against those who smoke. And, much less play the game the establishment of rules and prohibitions, under the pretext of wanting to cure addicts, coercitivament impose protective mantle of the State on our personal behavior.

was really a concern and a personal challenge not to fall into what I call "the syndrome of San Pablo fallen horse," and since my "conversion" began to persecute smokers (remember that Stalin was seminarian There are both examples ...) It

that our far-sighted understanding that we will not take up smoking to think they must do and we have no strength, and perhaps the moral obligation, to make him see it, aside from the respect freedom of each individual to decide what to do with your life and health. I do not want to smoke, but I still have the freedom to do this my will and not for others, whether friends, relatives or police.

All that we smoked heme heme encontrado ese during period (our Dark Years (u oscurecidos by the smoke)) con gente that, with different intentions, blasmado have our vices. ¿Vuestra attitude recall which was in front of them?

In particular, mine was belligerent. Being, as indeed we are all we have smoked, aware of the malignancy of my service, both for its physical damage and for its mental esclavajes was convinced it was the sole owner of my decision and my health.

Today, in my strong transition and from my position as a smoker who has ten months without smoking at an ex-smoker, crushed rock with conviction that my path has no return, that disease and mental misery are no longer an option, I still maintain that we should not show hostility against those who smoke. Much less, further the game to the establishment of rules and prohibitions under the pretext of wanting to cure addicts, coercively imposed the protective mantle of the State on our personal behavior.

was really a concern and a personal challenge not to fall into what I call the "syndrome of San Pablo fallen from his horse" and since my "conversion", begin to chase the smokers (remember that Stalin was a seminarian and there are so many examples ...)

It's just that our farsighted understanding that we should not smoke does not lead us to believe that anyone should do it and we have the strength and perhaps a moral obligation make him see, regardless of respect for individual freedom of each to decide what to do with your life and your health. I do not want to smoke, but I still have the freedom to do my own will and not by others, whether friends, family or police.

Dogging Crossdressers

dogmas and dogmas. Dogmas and more dogmas.



(Castilian translation follows)

polític dogma com a substitute for religious faith. The Dialectic Materialism ol'espiritualitat-change transformer.

Sovint se'ns venen els sistemes Marxist politics (i do not nouns, that article further ja amb aixi will be the National) as societies where esoteric spirituality has no loc. They managed to eradicate from the mind of the people than the idea of \u200b\u200ba god, we are told. In Cuba, China, Korea, the masses do not worship any deity, supernatural, superstitions have expired .... As if deeply rooted in the mystical meaning man in over a hundred millennia could overcome be by decree. If it were so and the seed of scientific rationalism could bear fruit in a simple ...

On the contrary, in my opinion, what really has happened is the replacement (successful, no doubt) of a paranormal nature of religious dogma to political dogma, more humane, but it contains at its core elements of irrational faith in a higher good that characterizes religious belief. Faith in God is replaced by faith in the system, the priests or imams, the politburo, the persistence of the sacred immutability of the permanent revolution and vigilant.

are systems such as theocratic, that is anatemitzada dissent and persecuted with equal or greater fury, and in which the discrepancy is pursued relentlessly for the body doctrine is so alien to reason that the smallest doubt can shook all their ideological scaffolding.

The real danger of this "Gospel" is that the claim that its base rests on the sociological scientism, his false anthropocentrism, away from the supernatural phenomena, you can easily fill the void left in the minds mystic abandonment of rational religious magic.

The proof of its falsity, the weakness of their ideology, it is only a temporary replacement. Indeed, once ensorrats political systems that sustain it, the public will again be the mystical, and not finding them other than the traditional base occultist, delivered again with more fervor almost always the paranormalitat irrational religion.

What we need, in fact, spiritual values \u200b\u200bare rational, based on our own human condition. Values \u200b\u200bsuch as empathy, or solidarity, or compassion, which have values \u200b\u200bin themselves, without having to go associated with witchcraft or miracles. Securities in which support us to find ways of overcoming individual, collective (evolutionary, even) to make the transition from the magical and irrational crutch with us since our inception as a species until it approaches modern ethics allow us sufficient time to overcome the current uncertainty as where the line of speculative approach to the solution of economic, demographic, technological and environmental issues that threaten us, so unusual in our history in terms of magnitude and nature depend on our future as a species. Confronting them with the same spiritual weapons that we have used so far infantiloides leads, clearly and inevitably to disaster. The scientific progress must be accompanied by the corresponding spiritual emancipation.

maturity. Organize ourselves. Not much time.




DOGMAS AND MORE DOGMAS

The political dogma as a substitute for religious faith. The dialectical materialism or Espiritualidad transformist transformer. Menudo In

you sell them to us Marxistas Political systems (And not, as it was also well under National Socialism) and societies where esoteric spirituality has no place. Have managed to eradicate from people's minds the idea of \u200b\u200ba superior god, we are told. In Cuba, China, Korea, the masses do not worship any deity, supernatural, superstitions have expired .... As if the mystical meaning deeply rooted in man over a hundred thousand could be overcome by fiat. Would that it were so, and the seed of scientific rationalism could bear fruit so simple.

the contrary, in my opinion, what has actually happened is the replacement (successful, no doubt), a paranormal nature religious dogma by political dogma, much more human, but contains at its core elements of irrational faith in a higher good that characterized religious belief. Faith in God is changed by faith in the system, the priests and imams, the politburo, the persistence of immutability, the permanent revolution and vigilant.

are systems such as theocratic, where the discrepancy is anathema and persecuted with equal or greater fury, and in which dissent is pursued relentlessly why the body of doctrine is as alien to reason that the slightest doubt can shake all their ideological scaffolding.

real danger of this "gospel" is that, claim that its base rests on the sociological scientism, his false anthropocentrism, away from the supernatural, can easily fill the void left mystic rational minds abandonment of religious magic.

proof of its falsity, the weakness of its ideology, is that it is only a temporary replacement. In fact, once sunken systems that sustain it, the citizens need to back the mystique and, finding no other basis than the traditional occult comes again with more fervor almost always, the paranormal irrational religion.

What we need are actually rational spiritual values, based in our own human condition. Values \u200b\u200bsuch as empathy, or solidarity, or compassion, which have value in themselves, without having to be associated with sorcery or miracles. Values \u200b\u200bthat support us to find ways of overcoming individual, collective (evolutionary, even) to make the step from the magical and irrational crutch with us since our inception as a species to proposals that will allow us sufficient time to overcome modern ethics of uncertainty like these, where speculative line of approach to solving the economic, environmental, demographic or technological changes that threaten us, in terms of magnitude i nature in a way unheard of in our history, our future as a species depends. Face them with the same childlike spiritual weapons that we have used so far will lead us, clearly and unavoidably, to the disaster. Scientific progress must be accompanied by a corresponding intellectual emancipation.

mature. 's Organize. Not much time left.

Mount And Blade Produktschlüssel

The most cowardly of you / The more cobarde vosotros

(Castilian translation follows)

Mètode Aquest és meu quan the syndrome d'm'ataca nicotine withdrawal. The covardia com a strategy. Ja know sounds a bit stupid, but it is a mental process that works for many. If I explain to you is because I am convinced that if I get it anyone can do it (because, as he happened to Wilde, even my weaknesses were stronger than me).

From the first day I learned to distinguish (non-smokers it is difficult, right?) These peaks anxiety that last only a few minutes, untimely but not unexpected, but they seem dangerous, for its short duration, with a minimal effort, you can reduce ridiculous. We like to think that you duraràs only three minutes, so make me fall? I take more time to reflect about your nature that will last your trouble, so do not take seriously, as usual ... This initiated the call and Craving that accompanies the early days.

Then comes the psychological aspect of detoxification. The dangerous truth. What makes you doubt, what leads you to those past times in the wasteland that was part of your life, remembering the good times you shared. The pleasure that the puff before sunset on top of that peak, or accompanying you as you read Camus, always playing jazz background (do not remember the bastard coughing, the furtivitat your vice in the rain looking through glass to friends who followed inside the restaurant, shame to smoke secretly in the bathroom of the airport, watching your stomach empty CT) When you see it always does in a forbidden apple. It is the critical moment, when a moment of hesitation can bring you instantly fatal thought: What if, just once, a land ...? After that you have only yourself to entrust your willpower, with better or worse depending on the luck you're in trance (a separation, a Bronco, a drunk ...) And even if you have, the more force of will, luck (yes, lucky) not to transfer, he has already established the mechanism. The rest is mere statistics.

In my case, if I were allowed, would have been the first to fall, no doubt. When I could foresee (it is easy to see coming after the Craving hold, as the "monkey" is more subtle, but now the component of immediacy) defeats me if I knew that catches me: why I decided from the outset was the most cowardly of you. And I got it. The mono when I won because I sense that will not stop running. For some, the thought is running the negative aspect of smoking, which has taken, arrossegaràs the disease forever. But for me, running is not stopped thinking about what I achieved, leaving it in my new goals, taking the future with your hands while I look the index fingers and dust that no longer hold any cigarette. Thinking the same sunset, the same peak, books, music, free of disease and slavery, think of all this nonstop .... And when I twist it is no longer there. Never resist a run and these are becoming shorter every day.

And most importantly, over time I have already established the mechanism and I do not need to be always alert. I've installed here and at this stage can not enter. And I can not remove. My life is not easy but complicated equation remains the same forever, and all yours. But both also tobacco has ceased to be part of a long time because, whatever happens, always follow and never viewed as a problem as a solution. No doubt. Never.

In short, it was only to tell you how we do not dare to look the monster in the face also, humbly, as we shall overcome.



me Methodology That is when the nicotine withdrawal syndrome stalk me. The strategy as cowardice. Now that sweat something stupid, but is a mental proceso us few works. If it expongo bone is why I am convinced that if anybody can get it why, as happened to Wilde, including my weaknesses were stronger than me.

From day one, I learned to distinguish (does not that difficult for smokers, right?), These peaks of anxiety lasting a few minutes, sudden but not unexpected, that seem dangerous but its short duration, with a minimum effort can be reduced to laughable. It is something like: Do you think that you, who are only going to last three minutes, you make me fall? I'll take more time to reflect on your nature that it will last your discomfort, so I'm not going to take seriously, just missing ... That, that those initiated into the agony call cravings, and the first few days with us.

Then there is the psychological aspect of detoxification. The really dangerous. It makes you doubt that, which brings you to these moors bygone era in which part of your life, always remembering the good times we shared. The pleasure of inhaled puff in front of a sunset on top of a gazebo, or accompanying you as you read Camus, always playing jazz background (the bastard coughing can forget the sneaky puff in the rain watching from the window your friends who were in the restaurant, shame and blandly illegal smoking in the bathroom the airport, the emptiness in my stomach watching your CT). When you encounter is always in a forbidden apple. That's the critical moment, in which a moment's hesitation can bring you instantly fatal thought: What if, just once, just one ... ...? After that, you still only entrust your willpower, with better or worse depending on your luck and fortitude that trance you're in that moment (a breakup, a fight, a drunken, ...) And even if you also strength, luck (yes, lucky) not to give, he has already established the mechanism. The rest is mere statistics.

In my case, if I had allowed that it would have been the first to fall, for sure. As I foresee it (it's easy to see coming, after enduring the craving because the monkey is more subtle, but it has that element of immediacy), I knew I would win if I get caught. Therefore, I decided from the outset to be the most cowardly of you. And I got it. The monkey beats me why as I suspect it will appear not stop running. For some, running is to think bad of snuff, as you removed, in this disease to drag forever. But for me there is no stop running stop thinking I've got leaving on my new achievements future holding hands, looking at those index and middle fingers and do not hold a cigarette. Think of that same sunset that book, that record, free from disease and slavery, think of all this straight ... .. And as I come back he is gone. Never resist a run and they are getting shorter every day.

And the main thing: after a while and I've set the automatic and do not need to be alert at all times. I have installed on that stage and there can not enter. And nothing can get me out of there. My life is not easy but it's still the same complicated equation ever, like all yours. But, of course, the snuff is no longer part of it from it because hare tiempo, pass it to pass, always follow visualizándole as a problem and never as a solution. Sin lugar a dudas, never.

In short, it was just like them explicaros atrevemos us not to look at the monster's face too, humildemente, you can we venciendo.

Cost Of Homemade Ice Shanty

between language and thought. Thought and Language and Lenguaje domain. Language and domain name.

(Follow Sprog)

First, look to start the analysis data presented in this post now as basis chomskyana philosophy in the sense of considering the capacity to acquire language is innate, configuring it as the cornerstone to guide the organization of our perception and thought. Therefore, without entering into a critique of Skinner's behaviorism, we will base on the axiom of Chomsky second language which models the thought. Hence we

collective legir no doubt that the language is absolutely crucial condition of our world view and our relationship with it. We form our own idea of \u200b\u200bwhat surrounds us from thinking that gave us the language and it is from this intellectual tool that we interact with our environment. Language is the weapon that we use also to relate with other people who shape our social life.

is not difficult therefore infer that, in this context of interpersonal relationships, our language, which we have conceptualized as the origin of our thinking is a standard specifically for social order, becoming a language of their manifestations. Therefore, this language must necessarily condition for its own origin, social thought, and especially political thought. If language influences thought, language as a derivative instrument, determines how we see the world. The example of the way the Inuit have to interact with their physical environment (and social derived from it) means, for example in the richness of their language to describe reality that archive (in terms of snow, ice, etc. ..) Therefore, the Inuit language determines your speakers for a particular conception the world, away from their world that has a speaker Maya. Different languages, different concepts, different logical structures of interaction.

From this concept is easy now to define the language as one of the most effective weapon of social domination. Impose your language to another instead of her becoming the most effective way of conquest. Not only impose your vision, but deprived of the instrument that allows you to have your own or any different from yours. He is forced to think under your mental premises. And with the disappearance of this language are hopelessly lost one of the ways that humans had to describe the universe, and we become, together, forever poorer.

In the first place, as fijemos Data start the analysis presented in this entry that has its basis in philosophy chomskyana in SENSE consider that the capacity for acquiring the Lenguaje are innate, such as configuring the corner stones that guide the organization of our perception and thought. Therefore, without entering into a critique of behaviorism of Skinner, we rely on the axiom of Chomsky as which language shapes thought.

It can gather, no doubt, that language is absolutely crucial condition of our world view and our relationship with it. We formed our own idea of \u200b\u200bwhat surrounds us from thinking that gave us the language and it is from this intellectual tool we interact with our environment. Language is the weapon that will serve us well to engage with other people who shape our social life.

is not difficult to deduce that in the context of interpersonal relationships, our language, which we have conceptualized as the source of our thinking, is standard specifically for a social order, constituting language as one of its manifestations. Therefore, that language must necessarily conditioned by their origin, social thought, and especially political thought. If language influences thought, language, and derivative, determines how we see the world. The example of the Inuit way they interact with their physical environment (social and derivative thereof) results, for example in the richness of their language to describe that reality (in terms of snow, ice, etc.. ...) Therefore, Inuit language affects their speakers for a particular world view, away from having your world a Mayan speaker. Different languages, different concepts, different logical structures of interaction.

From this view it is easy now to define the language as one of the most effective weapons of social domination. Imposing your language to another in lieu of his most effective means of conquest. You can not impose your vision, but stripped of the instrument that allows you to have your own, or any different from yours: you force yourself to think on your premises mental. And with the disappearance of that language are hopelessly lost one of the teníamos that shapes them to describe the universe and human volvemos us, all, most poor forever.

Pilar Montenegro En Fakes

Terrorism democracy. Analysis of a sectarian behavior / terrorism in democracy. Analysis of behavioral sectario

Follow Sprog

excluded from the scope of this analysis of religious terrorist groups. It would be stupid to think about sectarianism as a form of action groups that are, by definition, sectarian, sectarian understanding within the meaning of dogmatic organization.

What I put under the microscope is the structure of reasoning who is still killing, although their goals can be achieved by nonviolent means, and also exclude pathological behaviors (or psychiatric) assumes that its neighbor to the killer who has no ideological motivation sadistic

So what are the reasons that push someone to kill for an ideal? Discarded clinical reasons, and also discarded cases in which dictatorships and invasions can cover foreign policy, we have no explanation for the ideological sense of caging, in the belief that otherwise can not achieve their political objectives. And what degree of fault is in this state which attacked and what degree is society? I think that what Meridian does not trust the terrorist is in the population for which it is said, as if it had the support (or a portion of which was sufficient quantitative significance in institutions), would no doubt raise the their aspirations in a nonviolent, democratic and thereby increase their expectations of success.

Because if he does claim is immediately assumed that their political objectives and not merely the right to propose them, it is obvious that the will of the citizenry. This is a fascist attitude (although the English fascists now use this expression, together with of Nazi qualify for us Democrats lost credibility. But I still believe if adjusted)

So what happens to the ideological moments before an assassin to kill? Believe that this murder does not denigrates their ideals? The enemy give up their armies the next day, all fearful? They say that killing people is coming to defend their strategic objectives? It's more like we believe that a flying saucer come to save ... an idea is absurd, contradictory, beyond the wisdom, vinculable undoubtedly when their targets (which he sees only achievable) about the methods and when al'encarnació of dogma as a single value, a sect of any kind. Nothing is more important than the homeland, the leader, that faith, that the revolution that God, who ... It is exactly the same irrational behavior.

terrorism and tries to murder? The only reasonable option can only be: understand the terror, not among the enemy, but among its own citizens, among which aims to fight. His domination through violence. Pushing through fear their unconditional commitment to the cause (and its methods, entrenched in the very definition of project), with a forceful ideological core completely dogmatic (any other way by the dogma, the act of faith by thinking about his fight). Why do not realize at the time that violence has supplanted the impeachment because he has necessarily perverted, emptying it of essential critical capacity that defines and justifies any action policy? Because you can not do it without having to consider the purpose of his life and his sacred mission on earth ...

And because, at this point of irrationality, what you need (avoiding reflection) is the visceral reaction that we have come to the state when feelings replace the political reasoning. Repression, ilegalitzacions, closure of newspapers, popular consultations anatemització, indiscriminate arrests. Cross demonstrate his power, but what is perceived is real fear.

More fuel for a fire which does atre feedback to mutual interests, and.

Let's excluded from the scope of this analysis to the nature of religious terrorist groups. It would be a estupidez reflect on the actions of sectarianism as a form of groups that already are, by definition, sectarios, entendido sectario senses in organizational dogmatic. Lo que quiero

placed under the microscope is the structure of reasoning of those who continue to kill, even if their goals can be achieved by nonviolent means. (And we also exclude pathological behaviors and that, although undoubtedly some are due to psychological factors (or psychiatric). I am assuming that anyone who kills his fellow men is not motivated by ideology sadistic.

And then What are the reasons that drive someone to kill for an ideal? Discarded clinical reasons, and likewise dismissed the case and that a dictatorship or a foreign invasion to give political cover, we have no explanation for that feeling caging ideological, believing that otherwise could not achieve their political objectives. And how much of it the fault has been that attacks, and how much blame society? Meridian strikes me as a terrorist is not trusted by the population for which it is postulated, which if its support (or part of which was sufficient quantitative significance in institutions) could certainly raise their aspirations, so nonviolent democratic and increase their expectations of success.

Because if they do is claim to take away their political objectives and not merely the right to propose, is that ignore the will of the people. That is a fascist attitude (though now that the fascists used that term, along with the Nazis, to qualify for the Democrats lost credibility. But I still believe fit the case.)

And then what happens is by the head of a murderer ideological moments before death? Does he think that this murder does not denigrate its ideals? What the enemy will pay their armies the next day, seized by fear? That killing the people it claims to defend it on its strategic objectives? It's the closest thing to believe that a flying saucer come to save us ... It is an absurd idea, contradictory, others to sanity, linkable certainly in terms of objectives (Which only he perceived terrorist reachable), in their methods, and as the embodiment of dogma as a single value, a sect of any kind. Nothing is more important than the country, the leader, that faith, that the revolution, that God, who ... is exactly the same irrational behavior.

And what looks for the terrorist killings? The only reasonable option can only be one: to instill fear, not from the enemy, but among its own citizens, among the population which seeks to fight. Their domination through violence. Force for fear her unwavering commitment to the cause (and its methods, frozen in their own project definition), with its ideological core compulsory and fully revealed (in any other way than through dogma, the act of faith, you might consider the fight) Why do not realize at the time that violence has supplanted trial because it has perverted political necessity, emptying it of the necessary critical capacity that defines and justifies any political action? Why can not do without considering the very purpose of his life and his sacred mission on earth ....

And why, at this point of irrationality, what you need (to escape the reflection) is the visceral reaction that we have used the state when los sentimientos razonamiento replaced the policy. Repression, ilegalizaciones, CIERRE of newspapers, anatemización of popular consultations, indiscriminadas arrests. Cree demonstrated its power, but that it is percibe miedo.

More fuel for a fire that does not do something otra retroalimentarse and mutual interesadamente.